Dynamic Indices of Fluid Responsiveness
1. Concept of Fluid Responsiveness
Fluid responsiveness = ability of the heart to increase stroke volume (SV) or cardiac output (CO) in response to a fluid bolus.
- Conventionally defined as:
- ↑ SV or CO ≥10–15% after a fluid challenge
- Only ~50% of hemodynamically unstable ICU patients are fluid responsive
→ indiscriminate fluids → fluid overload, ARDS, AKI, ↑ mortality
👉 Hence the shift from static indices (CVP, PAOP) to dynamic indices
2. Static vs Dynamic Indices (High-yield Comparison)
|
Feature |
Static Indices |
Dynamic Indices |
|
Examples |
CVP, PAOP, LVEDP |
PPV, SVV, SPV, PLR |
|
Reflect preload? |
Yes (poorly) |
Yes (functionally) |
|
Predict fluid responsiveness |
Poor |
Good |
|
Depend on Frank–Starling curve position |
No |
Yes |
|
Evidence base |
Weak |
Strong |
|
Recommended by guidelines |
No |
Yes |
3. Physiological Basis of Dynamic Indices
Dynamic indices exploit heart–lung interactions during positive pressure ventilation.
Key Mechanisms:
- Inspiratory phase:
- ↑ Intrathoracic pressure
- ↓ Venous return → ↓ RV preload
- After 2–3 beats:
- ↓ LV preload → ↓ SV
- If patient is preload responsive:
- These cyclic changes are exaggerated
👉 The greater the respiratory variation, the more likely the patient is fluid responsive
4. Main Dynamic Indices (Core Exam Content)
A. Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV)
Definition
Respiratory variation in pulse pressure during mechanical ventilation.
PPV (%)=(PPmax +PPmin )/2PPmax −PPmin ×100
Where:
- Pulse pressure = SBP − DBP
Interpretation
|
PPV Value |
Interpretation |
|
< 10% |
Not fluid responsive |
|
10–13% |
Grey zone |
|
> 13% |
Fluid responsive |
Advantages
- Well validated
- Easy if arterial line present
- Strong evidence base
Limitations ❗ (Very Important for Exams)
PPV is unreliable in:
- Spontaneous breathing
- Atrial fibrillation / arrhythmias
- Low tidal volume ventilation (<6 ml/kg)
- Low lung compliance (ARDS)
- High PEEP
- Open chest
- RV failure / pulmonary hypertension
B. Stroke Volume Variation (SVV)
Definition
Respiratory variation in stroke volume, measured by pulse contour devices.
SVV (%)=SVmean SVmax −SVmin ×100
Interpretation
|
SVV |
Meaning |
|
< 10% |
Unlikely responder |
|
> 12–15% |
Likely responder |
Devices Used
- FloTrac/Vigileo
- LiDCO
- PiCCO
- Most advanced hemodynamic monitors
Pros
- Continuous
- Directly measures SV variation
- Better than PPV in some settings
Cons
- Same limitations as PPV
- Device-dependent accuracy
- Affected by vascular tone
C. Systolic Pressure Variation (SPV)
Definition
Difference between maximum and minimum systolic BP during one respiratory cycle.
SPV=SBPmax −SBPmin
Components
- ΔUp: Inspiratory increase in SBP
- ΔDown: Expiratory decrease in SBP (clinically more important)
Interpretation
|
SPV |
Significance |
|
> 10 mmHg |
Suggests fluid responsiveness |
|
ΔDown > 5 mmHg |
Strong indicator |
Exam Pearl 🧠
ΔDown reflects preload dependency, not ΔUp
D. Pleth Variability Index (PVI)
What it is
Respiratory variation in pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform.
- Non-invasive surrogate of PPV
- Derived from Masimo monitors
Interpretation
|
PVI |
Meaning |
|
< 10–13% |
Unlikely responder |
|
> 13–15% |
Likely responder |
Limitations
- Poor signal quality
- Vasoconstriction
- Hypothermia
- Low perfusion states
5. Passive Leg Raising (PLR): Dynamic Test (Most Important)
Principle
- Transfers ~300 ml venous blood from legs + splanchnic circulation
- Acts as a reversible fluid challenge
How to Perform Correctly (Exam Favorite)
- Start from semi-recumbent position
- Lower trunk to horizontal
- Raise legs to 45°
- Measure CO / SV change within 30–90 sec
Interpretation
|
Parameter |
Threshold |
|
↑ SV or CO ≥10% |
Fluid responsive |
|
No change |
Not responsive |
Why PLR is GOLD STANDARD
✔ Works in:
- Spontaneous breathing
- Arrhythmias
- Low tidal volume ventilation
- ARDS
✔ Reversible
✔ No fluid overload risk
Must Measure FLOW, Not Pressure ❗
Valid measurements:
- Echocardiography (LVOT VTI)
- Pulse contour CO
- Esophageal Doppler
Invalid:
- BP alone
- CVP change
6. Dynamic Indices: Conditions for Validity (Very High Yield)
All PPV/SVV/SPV require:
|
Requirement |
Why |
|
Controlled mechanical ventilation |
To generate regular intrathoracic pressure changes |
|
Tidal volume ≥ 8 ml/kg |
Adequate preload perturbation |
|
Sinus rhythm |
Arrhythmias distort variations |
|
Closed chest |
Open chest abolishes pressure transmission |
|
Normal RV function |
RV failure causes false positives |
7. Dynamic Indices vs Fluid Challenge
|
Aspect |
Dynamic Indices |
Fluid Challenge |
|
Fluid load |
None |
250–500 ml |
|
Reversibility |
Yes |
No |
|
Risk of overload |
None |
Present |
|
Speed |
Immediate |
Delayed |
|
Preferred strategy |
Yes |
If avoidable |
8. Current Guideline Perspective
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign:
- Recommends dynamic measures over static
- ESICM / SCCM:
- PLR + CO measurement preferred
- CVP no longer recommended to guide fluids
9. Practical ICU Algorithm (Exam-friendly)
- Shock patient → assess perfusion
- If mechanically ventilated:
- Use PPV / SVV (if criteria met)
- If spontaneous breathing / arrhythmia:
- Use PLR with CO monitoring
- Give fluids only if responsive
- Reassess frequently
10. Key points
- Dynamic indices assess position on Frank–Starling curve
- High PPV ≠ hypovolemia → only predicts responsiveness
- PLR is the most universally applicable test
- Static pressures ≠ preload
- Always interpret in clinical context

