Dynamic Indices of Fluid Responsiveness

1. Concept of Fluid Responsiveness

Fluid responsiveness = ability of the heart to increase stroke volume (SV) or cardiac output (CO) in response to a fluid bolus.

  • Conventionally defined as:
    • SV or CO ≥10–15% after a fluid challenge
  • Only ~50% of hemodynamically unstable ICU patients are fluid responsive
    indiscriminate fluids fluid overload, ARDS, AKI, mortality

👉 Hence the shift from static indices (CVP, PAOP) to dynamic indices


2. Static vs Dynamic Indices (High-yield Comparison)

Feature

Static Indices

Dynamic Indices

Examples

CVP, PAOP, LVEDP

PPV, SVV, SPV, PLR

Reflect preload?

Yes (poorly)

Yes (functionally)

Predict fluid responsiveness

Poor

Good

Depend on Frank–Starling curve position

 No

Yes

Evidence base

Weak

Strong

Recommended by guidelines

 No

Yes


3. Physiological Basis of Dynamic Indices

Dynamic indices exploit heart–lung interactions during positive pressure ventilation.

Key Mechanisms:

  1. Inspiratory phase:
    • Intrathoracic pressure
    • Venous return RV preload
  1. After 2–3 beats:
    • LV preload SV
  1. If patient is preload responsive:
    • These cyclic changes are exaggerated

👉 The greater the respiratory variation, the more likely the patient is fluid responsive


4. Main Dynamic Indices (Core Exam Content)


A. Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV)

Definition

Respiratory variation in pulse pressure during mechanical ventilation.

PPV (%)=(PPmax +PPmin )/2PPmax −PPmin ×100

Where:

  • Pulse pressure = SBP − DBP


Interpretation

PPV Value

Interpretation

< 10%

Not fluid responsive

10–13%

Grey zone

> 13%

Fluid responsive


Advantages

  • Well validated
  • Easy if arterial line present
  • Strong evidence base


Limitations (Very Important for Exams)

PPV is unreliable in:

  • Spontaneous breathing
  • Atrial fibrillation / arrhythmias
  • Low tidal volume ventilation (<6 ml/kg)
  • Low lung compliance (ARDS)
  • High PEEP
  • Open chest
  • RV failure / pulmonary hypertension


B. Stroke Volume Variation (SVV)

Definition

Respiratory variation in stroke volume, measured by pulse contour devices.

SVV (%)=SVmean SVmax −SVmin ×100


Interpretation

SVV

Meaning

< 10%

Unlikely responder

> 12–15%

Likely responder


Devices Used

  • FloTrac/Vigileo
  • LiDCO
  • PiCCO
  • Most advanced hemodynamic monitors


Pros

  • Continuous
  • Directly measures SV variation
  • Better than PPV in some settings


Cons

  • Same limitations as PPV
  • Device-dependent accuracy
  • Affected by vascular tone


C. Systolic Pressure Variation (SPV)

Definition

Difference between maximum and minimum systolic BP during one respiratory cycle.

SPV=SBPmax −SBPmin


Components

  • ΔUp: Inspiratory increase in SBP
  • ΔDown: Expiratory decrease in SBP (clinically more important)


Interpretation

SPV

Significance

> 10 mmHg

Suggests fluid responsiveness

ΔDown > 5 mmHg

Strong indicator


Exam Pearl 🧠

ΔDown reflects preload dependency, not ΔUp


D. Pleth Variability Index (PVI)

What it is

Respiratory variation in pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform.

  • Non-invasive surrogate of PPV
  • Derived from Masimo monitors


Interpretation

PVI

Meaning

< 10–13%

Unlikely responder

> 13–15%

Likely responder


Limitations

  • Poor signal quality
  • Vasoconstriction
  • Hypothermia
  • Low perfusion states


5. Passive Leg Raising (PLR): Dynamic Test (Most Important)

Principle

  • Transfers ~300 ml venous blood from legs + splanchnic circulation
  • Acts as a reversible fluid challenge


How to Perform Correctly (Exam Favorite)

  1. Start from semi-recumbent position
  2. Lower trunk to horizontal
  3. Raise legs to 45°
  4. Measure CO / SV change within 30–90 sec


Interpretation

Parameter

Threshold

SV or CO ≥10%

Fluid responsive

No change

Not responsive


Why PLR is GOLD STANDARD

Works in:

  • Spontaneous breathing
  • Arrhythmias
  • Low tidal volume ventilation
  • ARDS

Reversible
No fluid overload risk


Must Measure FLOW, Not Pressure

Valid measurements:

  • Echocardiography (LVOT VTI)
  • Pulse contour CO
  • Esophageal Doppler

Invalid:

  • BP alone
  • CVP change


6. Dynamic Indices: Conditions for Validity (Very High Yield)

All PPV/SVV/SPV require:

Requirement

Why

Controlled mechanical ventilation

To generate regular intrathoracic pressure changes

Tidal volume ≥ 8 ml/kg

Adequate preload perturbation

Sinus rhythm

Arrhythmias distort variations

Closed chest

Open chest abolishes pressure transmission

Normal RV function

RV failure causes false positives


7. Dynamic Indices vs Fluid Challenge

Aspect

Dynamic Indices

Fluid Challenge

Fluid load

None

250–500 ml

Reversibility

Yes

No

Risk of overload

None

Present

Speed

Immediate

Delayed

Preferred strategy

Yes

 If avoidable


8. Current Guideline Perspective

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign:
    • Recommends dynamic measures over static
  • ESICM / SCCM:
    • PLR + CO measurement preferred
  • CVP no longer recommended to guide fluids


9. Practical ICU Algorithm (Exam-friendly)

  1. Shock patient assess perfusion
  2. If mechanically ventilated:
    • Use PPV / SVV (if criteria met)
  1. If spontaneous breathing / arrhythmia:
    • Use PLR with CO monitoring
  1. Give fluids only if responsive
  2. Reassess frequently


10. Key points 

  • Dynamic indices assess position on Frank–Starling curve
  • High PPV ≠ hypovolemia only predicts responsiveness
  • PLR is the most universally applicable test
  • Static pressures ≠ preload
  • Always interpret in clinical context