NEUROLOGICAL PROGNOSTICATION AFTER CARDIAC ARREST
INTRODUCTION
Neurological prognostication refers to prediction of long-term neurological outcome in comatose survivors after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following cardiac arrest.
Immediately after ROSC, coma and absent brainstem reflexes usually represent transient post-ischemic brain dysfunction โ not brain death โ hence Brain Stem Death protocol must be delayed
WHY PROGNOSTICATION IS COMPLEX
Post-cardiac arrest brain injury involves:
Primary Injury
- Global cerebral ischemia during arrest
Secondary Injury
- Reperfusion injury
- Cytotoxic edema
- Excitotoxicity
- Inflammation
- Mitochondrial failure
๐ Neurological recovery is time-dependent
๐ Sedation, metabolic derangements, hypothermia may mask neurological signs
WHEN TO PERFORM PROGNOSTICATION
Guideline Recommendation
๐ According to ERC 2021 / ESICM / AHA 2020
Definitive prognostication โฅ 72 HOURS after ROSC
OR
โฅ 72 HOURS after rewarming
(in patients treated with targeted temperature management โ TTM)
Why 72 Hours?
- Sedative drugs may persist
- TTM delays drug metabolism
- Neurological recovery is delayed
- Prevents false pessimism
PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR PROGNOSTICATION
Must have:
โ Persistent coma
โ GCS Motor โค 3
โ Absence of confounders
MAJOR CONFOUNDERS (MUST BE EXCLUDED)
Drug related
- Sedatives
- Opioids
- Neuromuscular blockers
Metabolic
- Severe electrolyte abnormality
- Hypoglycemia
- Hepatic encephalopathy
- Uremia
Physiological
- Hypothermia
- Shock
- Severe hypoxia
- Severe hypotension
OUTCOME DEFINITIONS
Good Neurological Outcome
- CPC 1โ2 (Cerebral Performance Category)
Poor Neurological Outcome
- CPC 3โ5
- Severe disability
- Vegetative state
- Brain death
- Death
CORE PRINCIPLE
๐ Multimodal Prognostication is Mandatory
Never rely on a single test
PROGNOSTICATION MODALITIES
1๏ธโฃ CLINICAL EXAMINATION
Pupillary Reflex
Bilateral absence at โฅ72 hours
- Strong predictor of poor outcome
- False positive rate โ 0โ5%
Corneal Reflex
Absent bilaterally
- Highly specific for poor prognosis
Motor Response
Motor score โค3
(Abnormal flexion or worse)
- Used as screening marker
- Alone NOT sufficient
Status Myoclonus
Early generalized myoclonus (<48 hr)
- Suggests severe injury
- Especially if:
- Continuous
- Associated with burst suppression EEG
โ Exception:
- Lance-Adams syndrome (late action myoclonus โ good outcome possible)
2๏ธโฃ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP)
Bilaterally absent N20 cortical response
๐ One of the MOST RELIABLE predictors
- Very high specificity (>95%)
- Not affected by sedation
- Should be performed โฅ24โ72 hours
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Highly malignant patterns:
โ Suppressed background
โ Burst suppression
โ Generalized periodic discharges on suppressed background
โ Non-reactive EEG
Favorable EEG Features:
โ Continuous background
โ EEG reactivity
โ Normal sleep patterns
3๏ธโฃ NEUROIMAGING
CT Brain
Poor prognostic signs:
โ Diffuse cerebral edema
โ Loss of grey-white differentiation
โ Effacement of sulci
โ Reduced GWR (Grey-White Ratio)
MRI Brain
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI)
Poor prognostic signs:
โ Extensive diffusion restriction
โ Cortical laminar necrosis
โ Basal ganglia injury
๐ MRI is more sensitive than CT
4๏ธโฃ BIOMARKERS
Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE)
Elevated NSE levels:
- Marker of neuronal injury
- Serial measurement preferred
Typical poor prognostic indicator:
๐ NSE > 60 ยตg/L at 48โ72 hr
(Exact threshold varies between guidelines)
Emerging Biomarkers
- Neurofilament light chain
- S100B protein
(Not yet standard)
Poor Prognosis Likely if โฅ2 Strong Predictors Present
Strong Predictors:
โ Absent pupillary reflex
โ Absent corneal reflex
โ Bilateral absent SSEP N20
โ Highly malignant EEG pattern
โ NSE markedly elevated
โ Severe cerebral edema on imaging
SPECIAL CLINICAL SIGNS
Post-Anoxic Status Epilepticus
Poor prognosis if:
โ Refractory seizures
โ Associated malignant EEG
But:
- Treat aggressively
- Some patients recover
Brainstem Dysfunction
Signs include:
โ Absent brainstem reflexes
โ Absent respiratory drive
Very poor prognosis
SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY PROBLEM
Early WLST based on premature assessment:
โก Artificially increases mortality
โก Overestimates poor prognosis
Hence guidelines insist:
๐ Multimodal + delayed assessment
WITHDRAWAL OF LIFE-SUSTAINING THERAPY (WLST)
Should be considered only if:
โ Multiple concordant poor prognostic markers
โ No confounders
โ Discussion with family
โ Ethical and institutional policy compliance

