NEUROLOGICAL PROGNOSTICATION AFTER CARDIAC ARREST
INTRODUCTION
Neurological prognostication refers to prediction of long-term neurological outcome in comatose survivors after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following cardiac arrest.
Immediately after ROSC, coma and absent brainstem reflexes usually represent transient post-ischemic brain dysfunction — not brain death — hence Brain Stem Death protocol must be delayed
WHY PROGNOSTICATION IS COMPLEX
Post-cardiac arrest brain injury involves:
Primary Injury
- Global cerebral ischemia during arrest
Secondary Injury
- Reperfusion injury
- Cytotoxic edema
- Excitotoxicity
- Inflammation
- Mitochondrial failure
👉 Neurological recovery is time-dependent
👉 Sedation, metabolic derangements, hypothermia may mask neurological signs
WHEN TO PERFORM PROGNOSTICATION
Guideline Recommendation
👉 According to ERC 2021 / ESICM / AHA 2020
Definitive prognostication ≥ 72 HOURS after ROSC
OR
≥ 72 HOURS after rewarming
(in patients treated with targeted temperature management – TTM)
Why 72 Hours?
- Sedative drugs may persist
- TTM delays drug metabolism
- Neurological recovery is delayed
- Prevents false pessimism
PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR PROGNOSTICATION
Must have:
✔ Persistent coma
✔ GCS Motor ≤ 3
✔ Absence of confounders
MAJOR CONFOUNDERS (MUST BE EXCLUDED)
Drug related
- Sedatives
- Opioids
- Neuromuscular blockers
Metabolic
- Severe electrolyte abnormality
- Hypoglycemia
- Hepatic encephalopathy
- Uremia
Physiological
- Hypothermia
- Shock
- Severe hypoxia
- Severe hypotension
OUTCOME DEFINITIONS
Good Neurological Outcome
- CPC 1–2 (Cerebral Performance Category)
Poor Neurological Outcome
- CPC 3–5
- Severe disability
- Vegetative state
- Brain death
- Death
CORE PRINCIPLE
👉 Multimodal Prognostication is Mandatory
Never rely on a single test
PROGNOSTICATION MODALITIES
1️⃣ CLINICAL EXAMINATION
Pupillary Reflex
Bilateral absence at ≥72 hours
- Strong predictor of poor outcome
- False positive rate ≈ 0–5%
Corneal Reflex
Absent bilaterally
- Highly specific for poor prognosis
Motor Response
Motor score ≤3
(Abnormal flexion or worse)
- Used as screening marker
- Alone NOT sufficient
Status Myoclonus
Early generalized myoclonus (<48 hr)
- Suggests severe injury
- Especially if:
- Continuous
- Associated with burst suppression EEG
⚠ Exception:
- Lance-Adams syndrome (late action myoclonus → good outcome possible)
2️⃣ ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP)
Bilaterally absent N20 cortical response
👉 One of the MOST RELIABLE predictors
- Very high specificity (>95%)
- Not affected by sedation
- Should be performed ≥24–72 hours
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Highly malignant patterns:
✔ Suppressed background
✔ Burst suppression
✔ Generalized periodic discharges on suppressed background
✔ Non-reactive EEG
Favorable EEG Features:
✔ Continuous background
✔ EEG reactivity
✔ Normal sleep patterns
3️⃣ NEUROIMAGING
CT Brain
Poor prognostic signs:
✔ Diffuse cerebral edema
✔ Loss of grey-white differentiation
✔ Effacement of sulci
✔ Reduced GWR (Grey-White Ratio)
MRI Brain
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI)
Poor prognostic signs:
✔ Extensive diffusion restriction
✔ Cortical laminar necrosis
✔ Basal ganglia injury
👉 MRI is more sensitive than CT
4️⃣ BIOMARKERS
Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE)
Elevated NSE levels:
- Marker of neuronal injury
- Serial measurement preferred
Typical poor prognostic indicator:
👉 NSE > 60 µg/L at 48–72 hr
(Exact threshold varies between guidelines)
Emerging Biomarkers
- Neurofilament light chain
- S100B protein
(Not yet standard)
Poor Prognosis Likely if ≥2 Strong Predictors Present
Strong Predictors:
✔ Absent pupillary reflex
✔ Absent corneal reflex
✔ Bilateral absent SSEP N20
✔ Highly malignant EEG pattern
✔ NSE markedly elevated
✔ Severe cerebral edema on imaging
SPECIAL CLINICAL SIGNS
Post-Anoxic Status Epilepticus
Poor prognosis if:
✔ Refractory seizures
✔ Associated malignant EEG
But:
- Treat aggressively
- Some patients recover
Brainstem Dysfunction
Signs include:
✔ Absent brainstem reflexes
✔ Absent respiratory drive
Very poor prognosis
SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY PROBLEM
Early WLST based on premature assessment:
➡ Artificially increases mortality
➡ Overestimates poor prognosis
Hence guidelines insist:
👉 Multimodal + delayed assessment
WITHDRAWAL OF LIFE-SUSTAINING THERAPY (WLST)
Should be considered only if:
✔ Multiple concordant poor prognostic markers
✔ No confounders
✔ Discussion with family
✔ Ethical and institutional policy compliance
